This blog follows on from the previous one, “Democracy but no sausage”. Once again, ChatGPT has done the heavy lifting of research and writing. If you’d like the official history, visit https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/Visit-and-learn/History/Overview
I asked ChatGPT to write a post about history of the dissolution of Queensland’s upper house in the 1920s. This is what it wrote.
—
The Dissolution of Queensland’s Upper House: A Political Turning Point in the 1920s
Queensland’s political landscape in the early 20th century was marked by an event that would fundamentally change its governance: the dissolution of the state’s upper house, the Legislative Council, in 1922. This drastic political move was not just about a change in structure; it was the culmination of growing dissatisfaction with the state’s political institutions and the increasing demand for democratic reform. To understand why this happened, we must delve into the history, context, and aftermath of this significant moment in Queensland’s political history.
The Formation and Role of the Legislative Council
The Queensland Parliament, established in 1859 with the creation of the state, originally consisted of a bicameral legislature—an upper house (the Legislative Council) and a lower house (the Legislative Assembly). The Legislative Council was designed to be a house of review, mirroring the British House of Lords. It consisted of appointed members, who were typically selected from the wealthier classes, including landowners, business leaders, and others with vested interests in maintaining the status quo.
The members of the Legislative Council were appointed for life, and this lack of electoral accountability gave the Council significant power, often allowing it to block legislation passed by the elected Legislative Assembly. This power imbalance would later become a key source of frustration for the growing numbers of working-class voters and democratic reformers in Queensland.
Political Climate Leading to the Dissolution
By the early 20th century, the political environment in Queensland was undergoing significant changes. The rise of labor movements, coupled with growing demands for greater democracy and equality, created a fertile ground for reform. In 1899, the Australian Labor Party (ALP) had made significant inroads in the state, and by 1915, the Labor government under Premier Ted Theodore was in power.
Despite these changes, the Legislative Council remained a strong conservative institution that obstructed many progressive reforms. For example, in the early 1920s, the Council blocked several important pieces of social legislation proposed by the Labor government, including measures aimed at improving workers’ rights and social welfare.
This antagonistic relationship between the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council began to sow the seeds for a major political confrontation.
The 1922 Crisis
In 1922, a standoff between the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council reached its boiling point. The issue at hand was the refusal of the Council to pass key pieces of legislation, including reforms to taxation and workers’ rights. These reforms were central to the Labor Party’s agenda and the government’s legitimacy. The Council’s repeated vetoing of the legislation was seen as an affront to the will of the people, especially as the Assembly had been elected by universal suffrage.
Premier William McCormack, who had succeeded Theodore, became increasingly frustrated by the Council’s resistance to progressive legislation. In response to the deadlock, McCormack and his government decided to act. In 1922, they introduced a bill that would allow the Legislative Assembly to dissolve the Legislative Council. This was a radical step, as it sought to abolish a long-established institution that had been a cornerstone of Queensland’s political system for over six decades.
The Political Struggle and the Referendum
The decision to dissolve the Legislative Council sparked a political firestorm. Opponents of the move, including conservative factions and many members of the business elite, mounted a fierce campaign to save the Council. They argued that the Legislative Council was a necessary check on the power of the popularly elected lower house, and that its abolition would lead to a dangerous concentration of power in the hands of the government.
In response to this opposition, the government decided to put the question to the people of Queensland through a referendum. The referendum was held on 27 May 1922, and voters were asked whether they supported the proposal to abolish the Legislative Council. The result was a resounding victory for the Labor government. Approximately 53% of voters supported the dissolution of the upper house, while 47% opposed it.
While the referendum result was decisive, the campaign leading up to it had been intense, with both sides using their resources to sway public opinion. Ultimately, the people of Queensland had spoken, and the fate of the Legislative Council was sealed.
The Abolition of the Upper House
Following the success of the referendum, the Queensland Parliament passed the Legislative Council Abolition Act in 1922, which officially dissolved the upper house. The final session of the Legislative Council was held on 22 December 1922, and the last members of the Council formally vacated their positions. The Queensland Parliament became unicameral, with only the Legislative Assembly remaining.
The dissolution of the Legislative Council was a watershed moment in Queensland’s political history. It represented the triumph of democratic reformers over an unelected, aristocratic institution that had resisted change for decades. The event also reflected broader national trends toward greater democracy, with other states in Australia considering or implementing similar reforms in the years that followed.
Aftermath and Legacy
In the years following the dissolution of the Legislative Council, Queensland’s political system underwent significant changes. The Labor government, having successfully abolished the upper house, continued to dominate the state’s politics for several more decades. However, the abolition of the Legislative Council did not end political tensions in Queensland. The Labor Party faced continued opposition from conservative forces, including business interests and the non-Labor parties.
The move also had long-term implications for Queensland’s political culture. Without a second chamber to review and amend legislation, the Legislative Assembly held all the power, leading to greater political polarization and, at times, less scrutiny of government decisions. This created challenges for subsequent governments, as well as a growing debate about the necessity of revisiting Queensland’s political structure.
Despite these challenges, the abolition of the Legislative Council is seen by many as a pivotal moment in the state’s democratic development. It marked a shift away from an elitist, undemocratic system of governance and toward a more accountable and representative model. The referendum and its result are often cited as a key example of the power of the people to reshape their political institutions.
Conclusion
The dissolution of Queensland’s Legislative Council in 1922 was a dramatic and transformative event in the state’s history. It represented the culmination of decades of political struggle, reflecting broader social and political changes in Queensland and Australia at large. The decision to abolish the upper house, following a successful referendum, was a bold statement about the power of the people and the need for democratic reform.
While the dissolution led to a shift in Queensland’s political structure, it also sparked debates about the balance of power, representation, and governance that continue to resonate today. The legacy of the 1922 referendum remains an important chapter in the story of Queensland’s political evolution, shaping the state’s political landscape for generations to come.
—
The next post in the sequence will be about the yacht Lucinda, and the triumph and tragedy in its history.
The Auld Skald's Fudgel 