In parts 1 and 2, I shared conversations with ChatGPT about telos and rhetoric. In this, part 3, I’ll share the poem, the essay, and ChatGPT’s analysis of how my hypempathy overrode my ability to dispassionately complete an explication essay about that poem.
The Jaguar
Sarah Holland Blatt
It shone like an insect in the driveway:
iridescent emerald, out-of-season Christmas beetle.
Metallic flecks in the paint like riverbed tailings,
squeaking doeskin seats. Bottle green, my father called it,
or else forest. A folly he bought without test-driving,
vintage 1980 XJ, a rebellion against his tremoring hands.
The sole bidder, he won the auction without trying
the day after the doctor told him to draw a line
under his driving years. My mother didn’t speak
for weeks. It gleamed on the terracotta drive,
wildcat forever lunging on the hood,
chrome snagging in the sun,
ornament of my father’s madness,
miraculous and sleek, until he started to tinker,
painted the leather seats with acrylic
so they peeled and cracked, jacked the gearstick,
hacked a hole into the dash with a Stanley knife,
jury-rigged the driver’s seat so it sat so low
you couldn’t see over the dash. For a few months
he drove it even though my mother begged,
he drove it as though he was punishing her,
dangerously fast on the back roads, then
opened up the engine on the highway, full
throttle, evn though he was going blind in one eye,
even though my mother and I refused to get in,
and for the first time in years my father
was happy—he was happy to be driving,
he was happy my mother and I
were miserable. Finally his modifications
killed it, the car he always wanted and waited
so long to buy, and it sat like a carcass
in the garage, like a headstone, like a coffin—
but it’s no symbol or metaphor. I can’t make anything of it.
https://meanjin.com.au/poetry/the-jaguar/
That university assignment
In the “Creative Writing – Poetics” course, one of the assessment pieces was an explication essay of this poem. As mentioned in Part 2,, I found myself incapable of analysing the rhetoric in this poem. In hindsight, it was the autistic hyperempathy that got in the way of that explication. It was my bewilderment at this that was one of the biggest prompts to seek an autism assessment.
ChatGPT: That experience must have been incredibly frustrating, yet it’s interesting how it ultimately led you to seek an autism assessment. It highlights something that many autistic individuals encounter—an ability to understand and discuss complex concepts but struggling to apply them in specific, expected ways. In your case, it seems like you had the knowledge of rhetoric, ethos, pathos, and logos—the theoretical understanding was clear—but when asked to analyze their use in the context of a poem, your mind might have processed that request differently.
This disconnect between understanding concepts and being able to use them in conventional or expected ways is often linked to autistic thinking patterns. Here are a few possible reasons why this might have happened:
1. Gestalt Processing
Many autistic people think in gestalts, or whole patterns, rather than in linear, sequential steps. You might have grasped the overall meaning of the rhetorical concepts or the poem in its entirety, but breaking it down into specific instances of ethos, pathos, and logos as required for the essay may have felt unnatural or forced. Gestalt processing can make it difficult to focus on details in isolation, especially when you perceive the whole in a more abstract or intuitive way.
2. Difficulty with Imposed Structures
Some autistic individuals have a hard time with structured tasks that don’t match their natural ways of thinking or processing information. You might understand ethos, pathos, and logos in a way that doesn’t conform to traditional rhetorical analysis, making it challenging to perform the task as expected by the teacher or assignment. The academic requirement to analyze poetry in this rigid way may have felt incongruent with how you naturally engage with language.
3. Hyperfocus on Detail or Overarching Themes
Autistic people can sometimes get hyperfocused on either tiny details or overarching themes, which might make rhetorical analysis tricky if it requires you to balance between the two. In this case, perhaps the analysis needed a delicate interplay between understanding individual rhetorical strategies and how they work together within the poem, something that might have felt fragmented or disjointed to your way of thinking.
4. Literal Thinking
If you tend to think literally, which is common in autistic people, analyzing a poem for abstract rhetorical devices could have posed a challenge. Poems often operate on metaphor, symbolism, and subtlety, and while you may understand those elements conceptually, applying rhetorical analysis could require a different level of abstraction that feels uncomfortable or confusing.
5. Disconnect Between Theory and Practice
Many people with autism are highly intelligent and can grasp complex theories with ease, but when it comes to applying them in specific contexts, such as analyzing poetry, there’s often a gap. This could be related to the brain’s wiring in terms of how it connects abstract knowledge to practical applications, especially when the task feels ambiguous or subjective.
Your experience highlights the nuanced ways in which autism can manifest, particularly when it comes to processing language and abstract concepts. The struggle you described—being able to discuss the rhetorical concepts but not apply them to the poem—was likely a significant autistic cognitive pattern in action, revealing that the standard ways of interpreting and analyzing literature didn’t quite align with how your brain processes information. It’s also a great example of how highly capable autistic individuals can be, while still encountering challenges in specific academic structures.
What did I actually submit?
This is the essay I submitted. Maybe it was because I also had the background of a husband with Huntington’s Disease, andother neurodegenerative condition, and it was just too close, emotionally, for me. Hyperempathy overrode all logical thought in this, and I didn’t have the capacity to go back and edit the essay before submitting it. What I now know as my autistic brain brought me to a standstill on this. Somehow, it still got a passing mark.
The Jaguar, by Sarah Holland-Batt, is from a book by the same name, the topic of which is the poet’s experience of her father’s affliction with Parkinson’s Disease, his decline and eventual death. The poem is free-form verse with no rhyming scheme. Told from a daughter’s perspective, it depicts the perplexing, complicated and emotional journey of observing a parent’s decline due to this neurodegenerative disorder. While it is assumed to be the natural order that children will bury their parents, the path to that event can often be complex and gut-wrenching and made worse when a degenerative brain disease that primarily affects the motor neurons in the brain also affects executive function and logic, leaving those watching unable to understand the motive behind the person’s actions. The free-form structure of the poem reflects the free-form nature of the disease’s impacts on the person, where each case follows the same pattern but is never the same as another. In this poem, the poet’s father’s incomprehensible actions are described, purchasing a car after his doctor had advised him to stop driving. He bought a car he had desired for many years and then proceeded to destroy it in what could be an echo of the disease destroying him.
Passages are rich in imagery, alternating with banal descriptions and periods of bewildered confusion and hurt. The vivid descriptions of the car, like ‘an insect on the driveway,’ its colour iridescent green, reforming the insect composite with the following comparison of a Christmas beetle, with its iridescent green carapace. Other rich imagery is presented in describing the car as a wildcat, ‘forever lounging,’ in reference to the car’s marque, Jaguar, against Panthera onca, the wild jaguar. The gradual destruction of the car through the father’s ‘tinkering’ resonates with the consonance of ‘cracked, jacked, hacked’ implying the violence of the assault on the machine. The poet’s bewilderment and anger are reinforced by the anaphora of ‘he drove it … he drove it’ and balanced by the desire for logic with the repetition of the second anaphora ‘even though … even though’. Yet the poet shows the decline of her father’s altered state of mind, deriving satisfaction from the distress inflicted on his wife and daughter, with the third anaphora, ‘he was happy … he was happy … he was happy.
The described process of purchasing the car at auction ‘without trying’, while seeming bizarre to the author, may have given the tantalising terror of finally having that thing that you have longed for at a time when you are not supposed to do that thing anymore, of the internal trauma of not being to enjoy that thing as you want to, that leads to destroying it. It is as if it is one last hurrah. Or was purchasing the car at auction an accident brought about by the involuntary movements of Parkinson’s Disease?
This is what ChatGPT had to say about it.
ChatGPT: Your essay is beautifully written and reflects a deep personal connection to the subject matter, which makes sense given your background and experience with Huntington’s Disease and its impact on your husband. This connection, while making your insights more poignant, may indeed have made it difficult to follow the formal requirements of the rhetorical analysis as expected for the essay.
What you wrote here focuses on the emotional and thematic content of the poem—how the father’s actions reflect the effects of Parkinson’s Disease, and the bewilderment, frustration, and grief experienced by the daughter observing his decline. You’ve explored the symbolism of the car, the rich imagery, and the destructive process the father undergoes, along with the emotional toll it takes on the family. All of these aspects are crucial to understanding the poem, but they step outside the rhetorical structure expected for the assignment.
Why It Might Not Have Met the Criteria:
- Personal Connection Over Rhetorical Framework: Your analysis draws heavily on your personal knowledge and emotional understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, which gave you a profound insight into the poem’s deeper meaning. However, this approach likely diverged from the assignment’s requirement to focus on rhetorical devices like ethos, pathos, and logos.
- Focus on Themes and Symbolism: While your essay discusses the imagery, symbolism, and emotional complexity of the poem, it doesn’t explicitly tie those observations back to the rhetorical elements that were likely the central focus of the assignment. The expectation might have been to break down the poem using ethos, pathos, and logos, analyzing how the poet uses them to engage the reader.
- Emotionally Close Subject Matter: Given your experience, it’s completely understandable that the poem resonated with you on a deeply emotional level. This could have made it challenging to approach the poem in a detached, analytical manner, as required by the assignment. When a piece of literature touches on something so personal, it can be difficult to apply a formal lens like rhetoric without getting drawn into its emotional core.
- Free-Form Reflection of Disease: You did an excellent job connecting the poem’s free-form verse with the unpredictable nature of the disease, but a rhetorical analysis would have needed a more direct focus on how ethos, pathos, and logos were employed by the poet to convey these ideas. For example, you might have been expected to analyze the credibility (ethos) established by the poet, the emotional appeal (pathos) in her descriptions of her father’s destruction of the car, and the logical structure (logos) of her narrative or lack thereof.
Moving Forward:
In hindsight, the challenge you faced with this essay highlights the difficulty of applying rigid academic frameworks like rhetorical analysis to deeply personal or emotionally charged material. For an autistic person, this mismatch can be even more pronounced, as the emotional resonance might overshadow the required academic structure.
What you wrote here is a beautiful interpretation of the poem, exploring its deeper meaning and emotional impact. However, for the specific assignment, a more structured rhetorical analysis (with clear references to ethos, pathos, and logos) might have been expected. In that context, it’s not that what you wrote was lacking in quality—it simply didn’t fit the precise criteria for the task at hand.
It’s interesting how this experience ultimately led you to your autism assessment. It speaks volumes about how academic expectations sometimes don’t align with how autistic individuals process information and emotions, especially when there’s a strong personal connection to the material.
If “artificial intelligence” is a tautology, in that intelligence cannot be artificial, and what we actually have is algorithmic recall, ChatGPT is still a good tool.
Me: Being a mature-age student was challenging, particularly with undiagnosed autism.
ChatGPT: can imagine how challenging it must have been to navigate academia as a mature-age student, especially with undiagnosed autism. The traditional educational environment often assumes a one-size-fits-all approach, which can make it incredibly difficult for those whose neurodivergent traits don’t align with those expectations.
Being undiagnosed likely amplified challenges such as:
- Overwhelm and burnout: Balancing life responsibilities, coursework, and managing the sensory, social, and cognitive demands of university could lead to burnout, especially without an understanding of the need for accommodations.
- Different learning styles: Academia often emphasizes certain ways of thinking, like rhetorical analysis or abstract reasoning, which may not align with the way autistic individuals process information, preferring more concrete, structured approaches.
- Social and communication difficulties: Group projects, networking, and navigating academic hierarchies might have been especially stressful without knowing why these interactions felt draining or confusing.
- Perfectionism or hyper-focus: Many autistic students experience intense pressure to perform perfectly, or hyper-focus on their interests, which can be rewarding but also isolating if those interests don’t match academic expectations.
Getting the autism diagnosis likely helped you make sense of why those experiences were so tough.
Next, Part 4 of “Under the influence of the Greeks”.



